The Canadian debit scheme Interac
has had its bid to change its status from a not-for-profit to a
for-profit entity turned down by Canada’s Bureau of Competition
Policy. Interac had wanted to change its status in order to compete
against its publicly-traded payment network rivals Visa and
MasterCard which are aiming to enter Canada’s C$163 million-a-year
debit market.
The denial of Interac’s bid means it now has
to find other ways of preserving its position in Canada’s debit
market at a time when Visa and MasterCard are making concerted
efforts to persuade Canadian banks and merchants to use their
network-branded debit propositions.
Go deeper with GlobalData
“Based on currently available information,
including Interac’s current dominant position in the market… the
bureau does not agree that the removal of the restriction against
for-profit activities by Interac would be pro-competitive, or is
necessary to allow Interac to remain competitive,” the bureau said
in a statement.
The bureau added that changes regarding
Interac’s governance structure would be permitted “as they would
maintain the necessary safeguards against anti-competitive
activity”, but that Interac must remain as a not-for-profit
entity.
Interac looks at other
options
Interac responded with
disappointment to the decision.
How well do you really know your competitors?
Access the most comprehensive Company Profiles on the market, powered by GlobalData. Save hours of research. Gain competitive edge.
Thank you!
Your download email will arrive shortly
Not ready to buy yet? Download a free sample
We are confident about the unique quality of our Company Profiles. However, we want you to make the most beneficial decision for your business, so we offer a free sample that you can download by submitting the below form
By GlobalData“We have always believed in arriving at an
effective business model… beyond a for-profit status,
particularly in the areas of governance, funding and our
organisational structure,” said Mark O’Connell, president and CEO
of Interac.
However, O’Connell added that Interac remains
“optimistic that further discussions can result in other variations
to the Consent Order [which sets out Interac’s not-for-profit basis
and organisational structure] that will enable Interac to more
effectively respond to the realities of the changing competitive
debit landscape.
“We are pleased that the Competition Bureau
will engage in discussions with us regarding these critical
issues.”
Among the ways in which Interac could change
its status could be to become a privately incorporated company.
The bureau’s decision has also been derided by
pro-merchant and consumer groups who fear that Visa and
MasterCard’s entry into the debit market will result in increased
costs of card acceptance and transaction fee levels.
In 2009, Canadian consumers carried out almost
4 billion debit transactions.
The Canadian Federation of Independent
Business (CFIB) said that the bureau’s ruling would constrain the
ability of Interac to compete on a level playing field.
“Since the mid-1980s, Interac has served
Canadian consumers and businesses very well with its low-cost debit
network, and small businesses in particular will be outraged if it
is permitted to be substantially diminished or eliminated by these
new market entrants,” said Catherine Swift, president of the
CFIB.
Swift also cited examples of Visa and
MasterCard entering debit card markets in other countries, which
she said has often edged the domestic player out “in one way or
another” and caused debit payment processing costs to rise.
Meanwhile, the Canadian government is pressing
ahead with plans to introduce a voluntary code of conduct for
credit and debit card providers which will focus on promoting fair
business practices. The code would enable merchants to choose which
payment options to accept.
The Canadian Code of Conduct for the Canadian
Credit and Debit Card Industry is being circulated for comment and
the final version is expected to be released within the next
weeks.
|
Canada |
|||
|
Interac statistics |
|||
|
Year |
IDP Terminals |
Transactions (m) |
Value of transactions (C$bn) |
|
2008 |
630,534 |
3,705 |
168 |
|
2007 |
603,248 |
3,451 |
156 |
|
2006 |
591,939 |
3,293 |
148 |
|
2005 |
571,353 |
3,070 |
137 |
|
2004 |
546,022 |
2,819 |
124 |
|
2003 |
520,563 |
2,590 |
116 |
|
2002 |
494,921 |
2,404 |
104 |
|
2001 |
463,244 |
2,236 |
94 |
|
2000 |
438,179 |
1,960 |
85 |
|
1999 |
406,050 |
1,661 |
72 |
|
1998 |
393,730 |
1,355 |
58 |
|
1997 |
330,530 |
1,003 |
44 |
|
Source: Interac |
|||
