Payment orchestration has become one of the most talked-about developments in the payments world. Everyone wants to offer it, and plenty claim to. But as more providers adopt the label, the gap between what’s promised and what’s delivered is growing.
For banks, acquirers and PSPs, that creates a real challenge. Orchestration has the potential to be a transformative layer: improving resilience, lowering cost-to-serve and enabling faster innovation. But only if the technology underneath the label can live up to the role.
Go deeper with GlobalData
The problem? Much of what’s being sold as orchestration today isn’t orchestration at all.
The rise of the rebrand
In the last two years, dozens of platforms have repositioned themselves as orchestrators, often in a bid for continued relevance. Some are traditional gateways adding API wrappers. Others are PSPs layering on reporting tools or dashboards. These additions might be useful, but they rarely deliver the kind of flexibility or interoperability that orchestration can.
This matters because many banks and PSPs are now basing strategic infrastructure decisions on solutions that may not hold up under pressure. What looks like a shortcut to innovation can quickly become another form of lock-in: with all similar limitations to the legacy setup it replaced.
Real orchestration isn’t about layering more interfaces onto existing systems, or about connecting legacy technology with more of the same. It’s about building a payments environment that can evolve quickly, connect openly and operate independently.
US Tariffs are shifting - will you react or anticipate?
Don’t let policy changes catch you off guard. Stay proactive with real-time data and expert analysis.
By GlobalDataWhat true orchestration looks like
At its core, orchestration should give financial institutions greater control and optionality across their payments stack. That means being able to route transactions dynamically based on performance, geography, cost and other factors, through layered rules. It means being able to switch or add providers, payment methods, reporting and new markets, without re-engineering everything. And it means seeing the entire flow, across all methods, partners and channels, in one place.
True orchestration is vendor-agnostic. It doesn’t favour one gateway, one acquirer, or one service provider. It allows for connection to the full ecosystem: local payment methods, PSPs, A2A, BNPL, fraud tools, tokenisation services, and more. It supports complex logic and redundancy in the background, so performance is always optimised.
The difference is architectural, not cosmetic. It’s the foundation for strategic agility, not a bolt-on.
Why the distinction matters
Most banks and PSPs don’t need more add-ons, they need faster response times, better fraud handling and infrastructure that can absorb complexity instead of multiplying it. They need technology that delivers against the demands of their customers and helps them keep pace with digital-first competitors. They need to tap into orchestration technology, to power innovation and redefine the way they offer services to their merchants. The speed of regulatory change alone makes this a high-stakes decision. Choosing the wrong orchestration partner now means more cost, more workaround and more risk down the line.
Getting it right creates space to move faster, serve merchants better and scale services with far less friction. It opens up the ability to test and adopt new payment types without reworking the stack each time. And it gives visibility not just into what’s happening, but why: and where performance can be improved.
One model, many use cases
The value of orchestration will look different depending on who’s using it. A luxury goods merchant might want to increase authorisation rates or power market expansion. A digital goods retailer may focus on personalising checkout experiences across different customer groups. A PSP might see orchestration as a way to increase resilience and compete in new markets.
Each use case is different, but the underlying principle is the same: control. Not just over costs or features, but over future flexibility.
That’s why understanding what’s behind the ‘orchestrator’ label is so important. Because the right decision today isn’t only about what the platform can do right now. It’s also about what it will let you do tomorrow.
Choosing the right partner
When evaluating orchestration providers, there are a few questions worth asking, especially if the platform is tied to a legacy gateway or acquirer.
- Is the solution vendor-neutral at its core, or does it favour specific partners?
- Can it be tailored to meet the varied needs of your cross-sector merchant base?
- Are failovers and routing handled intelligently, using multiple layered rules?
- Is the platform capable of giving you full transparency across your entire merchant base?
- Are you able to pick and choose the pieces of technology you need – and integrate them with your existing infrastructure?
The answers will quickly reveal whether the promise of orchestration is real, or just another version of what’s already on the table.
Building for what’s next
As orchestration becomes the new standard in payments infrastructure, the pressure to move quickly is understandable. But speed should not come at the cost of long-term flexibility. Banks and PSPs need infrastructure that lets them adapt as regulation tightens, fraud evolves, and customer demands shift.
That means looking past the label, asking harder questions, and choosing partners who are architecturally aligned with the future, not just dressed for it.
Jacob Spencer is Chief Revenue Officer at BR-DGE
